2009 Info
Small Family Car
Rating Expired
Download Report (Pdf)
Share this on:
Publication: Nov 2009
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
text a changé
-
Adult Occupant
96%
-
Child Occupant
84%
-
Pedestrian
34%
-
Safety Assist
71%
Total 34.5 Pts / 96%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
16 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Whiplash Rear Impact
3.1 Pts
Front Seat
Lateral Impact
15.4 Pts
Car
Pole
Comments
The Cruze scored maximum points in the frontal impact, both the driver and the passenger dummies indicating good protection of all body regions. The passenger compartment remained stable, the windscreen pillar moving rearward only 5mm. Chevrolet were able to demonstrate that the knees and femurs of occupants of a different size from the test dummies, or those sat in different seating positions, would be similarly well protected. The car also scored full points in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, only the chest did not score maximum points, although protection in that area was still considered adequate. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact was also good.
Total 41.3 Pts / 84%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Crash Test Performance 23.3 Pts
18 months old child
12 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer Baby Safe
Good
36 months old child
11.3 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer Duo Plus
Adequate
Safety Features 6.0 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
Not Available
CRS Installation Check 12.0 Pts
Comments
Based on dummy readings alone, the Cruze was awarded maximum points for its protection of the 18 month infant in the frontal and side impacts. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy was well controlled and both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their respective restraints in the side impact. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. A permanent label warns of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position without first disabling the airbag.
Total 12.2 Pts / 34%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
VRU Impact Protection
12.2 Pts
Head Impact 6.2 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
Comments
--pedestrianCommentEN--
Total 5.0 Pts / 71%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Speed Assistance 0 Pts
Electronic Stability Control 3 Pts
System Name | ESP | |
Performance |
Seatbelt Reminder 2.0 Pts
Applies To | Front seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Lane Support 0 Pts
AEB Inter-Urban 0 Pts
Comments
Electronic Stability Control is standard equipment on the Cruze, as is a seatbelt reminder for the driver and passenger seats.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Chevrolet Cruze 1.6 LS, LHD
Body Type - 4 door saloon
Year Of Publication 2009
Kerb Weight 1343kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Cruzes of the specification tested
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Integrated Child Seat
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
ESC
ESC
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Fitted to the vehicle as option
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
Not Available
Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Annual Reviews and Facelifts
Date
Event
Outcome
November 2009
Rating Published
2009
January 2016
Rating Expired
2009
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share